Will Saletan: The #MeToo Fail

Welcome to the Bulwark podcast. Happy Monday, and welcome back. Will Saletan. How are you? I’m doing fine, Charlie.

How about you? So as I was mentioning to you right before we we got started, these Monday podcasts are really difficult because there is so much going on. And just over the weekend to catch up with everything. You have to really go over your notes and realize, wow. So that happened since Friday morning.

So on Friday morning, We taped one of these. We recorded one of these with former congressman Adam Kinzinger. And pretty much after we were done recording, everything happened during the day. We had those, double court rulings coming down, basically saying, you know, Donald Trump is not a king just because you were president does not mean that you were immune from prosecution. So we had the appeals court come down, boom, and then judge Chuckkin, who had just an epic decision.

Also, I think it was about ten minutes after we were done, the House of Representatives voted to expel George Santos, which is really incredible. The only the sixth guy in American history to be spelled from the United States Congress. I think he’s the first one to be expelled without being convicted of a crime or being part of the civil war. Right? So, I mean, there’s there’s his ass stress on a footnote in American history, but in case you missed it, SNL, which is kinda hit and miss sometimes, They absolutely nailed this with their cold open.

Let’s just play a little bit of of their George Santos post expulsion press conference.

Okay. And, and, everyone. Stop assaulting me. I’m being assaulted. This entire country has been bullying me just because I am a proud gay thief What else is new?

America hates to see a Latino Queen winning. And since the day I was elected, it’s been a witch hunt, but if I’m guilty of anything, it’s for loving too much slash fraud. Now I’m sure you bloodthirsty Jackals in the media have a thousand mean nasty questions you’re dying to ask me. Go.

And it goes on like that, including his rendition of scandal in in the wind. I I guess there are a couple of points to be made about George Santos. I mean, he really is kind of a symbol of our times that someone like that could be in American politics. They could get elected that nobody would vet him before he got into office. And this flamboyantly corrupt individual turned out to be too embarrassing Even for a Republican party that’s about to re nominate Donald Trump, which is saying a hell of a lot, isn’t it?

That sketch is hilarious in part because it captures the relationship of Santos, but also other people like Santos in in politics with the media. Right? Well, we we bash the media. The media is evil. The media attacks us.

The media bullies but he totally craves the attention. He absolutely loves it. It that sketch is not far off from. I watched his final press conference that he did about the ethics investigation and his martyrdom. And it it was all about him being bullied, but he did say Charlie Sykes, apropos of Trump.

He did say no matter what happens, if he got expelled or whatever, he was still going to fight for one thing, and that was to see Donald Trump back in the White House.

I’ll bet he does. In a Congress and in a political party that has, you know, accepted the Marjorie Keller Greens, the Lauren Bobers, the Paul Gossars, you know, all of these bizarre figures you know, George Santos did sort of stand out as more flamboyantly corrupt than others. But I thought Adam Kinzinger made a great point in his sub newsletter, which I quoted my newsletter this morning, morning, shots. You should subscribe or at least think about it. He writes, Sandos was expelled for being Donald Trump.

It seems telling a liar fraud money launderer indicted hanger Honor is expelled from Congress while a liar fraud money launderer indicted hanger honor is leading the GOP race for president. This conundrum is not a conundrum at all. In fact, it is a feature of today’s GOP.

Ron DeSantis made this point. Right? He said, look, if you’re gonna start throwing people out for people who have not been convicted, he was drawing that distinction. But lying fraud? I mean, Congress is full of people.

Now honestly, he’s in a his own league as far as his whole life is a fraud. Right? I think that’s kinda what happened to him. And entertaining fraud. Yeah.

I mean, but, like, everything my favorite line about Santos’s expulsion was from Mark Strasseman on CBS who said, extentos has now been expelled. That part of his resume is real. It was like the rest of it is fake.

Yeah. I mean, obviously, the next chapter is probably him either cutting a plea deal or going to prison or a little bit of both of those things, which is gonna make it harder for him to get a cable gig You know, I’m I’m afraid we might not have him to kick around anymore. Although, I can certainly imagine historians trying to capture the, just the craziness of the politics of twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four. It is starting a chapter by talking about George Santos, you know, in the context of everything that that’s going on So I was actually on another podcast, talking to Fed’s podcast. I was kinda surprised that one of the other guests, and I don’t wanna get this wrong, but think a former member of Congress was saying that she was very troubled by the precedent set by the expulsion of George Santos because he hadn’t been convicted, which, of course, is the argument that the Republican leadership used, by the way, we ought to mention here, that every member of the Republican leadership of the house voted against expelling George Santos.

But she was saying it was a bad precedent. And I said, okay. It is a different precedent, but there are just some people that are just so far over the line. It’s sort of like, you know, I can’t define pornography, but you certainly know it when you see it. It’s like, do you really need a court of law to say that George Santos is a lying fraudster.

She I mean, it’s I mean, this one was not a close call as you saw from the overwhelming vote in the house.

To the extent that they tried to draw a line, a clear line as to why George Santos should be expelled, but not others in Congress, it was the ethics committee report. Right? We don’t have a conviction, but we have a committee report. Santos then attacks the committee report and says it wouldn’t pass muster in a court of law, that kind of thing. Yeah.

But I do wonder. I don’t want exactly defend George Santos, but why is Paul Gossar still in Congress? Why isn’t a sort of a explicit white nationalist? I mean, they’re There are other people. Senator of Menendez,

you know?

Or well, Menendez, right? He’s he’s accused of crimes, and that’s gonna be a prospect. There are things we know about some other members that ought to raise questions about whether they meet the moral standards to be in Congress.

Yeah. Okay. Okay. But then there’s Trump Okay. This party is about to renominate Donald Trump for the presidency despite the ninety one indictments, which is basically only a of all of the things that we know about Donald Trump, you know, including the the finding by a federal judge that he actually raped a woman, which I don’t know will you know, at one time, believe it or not, for some of our younger listeners in the before times, that would have been a problem that would have been disqualifying.

Now it’s, like, Yeah. There’s also that.

So can we just pause on that for a minute? Yes. So San Santos has been chucked out of Congress. Because the ethics committee, not a court of law, but the ethics committee passed this report

because we have standards.

Right. Right.

Yeah.

So that’s not even a legal proceeding. Donald Trump has been found liable by a jury of this legal process for sexual assault, which the judge then said would be called rape. Except under New York law. Right? And yet, the same members of Congress who Chuck George Santos are standing by the I don’t wanna say convicted, but found liable rapist.

So speaking of Donald Trump and religious faith, we had a couple of interesting moments. Did you see the video of all of the evangelical pastors praying over Donald Trump and I did not see this. Will not prevail against Donald Trump or something like like that. I don’t know whether it was intended to be an exorcism or what it was. And then you had Donald Trump who goes on a program.

Kind of one of these fluffer programs where they’re saying, Donald Trump, you are such a man of faith and such a man of prayer and ask him how he manages to endure all of these, you know, Christlike slings and arrows, and and how his faith strengthens him. And listen to how he answers this.

How do you do this? How where do you draw your strength from? We’re talking about faith.

How do you?

How do you do it? One of the reasons is that I have the highest point of these people have virtually ever seen.

Okay. So, see, Will, you just can’t make this shit up. I mean, sorry. So he’s asked about his faith, and he mentions his poll numbers. I mean, like, do we need to actually even say anything about this?

I It’s just about the worst thing you I mean, I could, like, literally literally the the some of the heart of Christianity is about not not caring what quote, men, what people think, right, focusing only on what god wants. And Donald Trump, just just the opposite. He says, you know, it’s the opinions of other people that that count, not not any sort of moral. On the same theme, Trump is giving a speech somewhere or other, and he’s talking about,

again, obsessing about the election and and the poll numbers and invokes, what he thinks would happen in the twenty twenty four election, if Jesus and god were running the election. I’m gonna put this in the category of Donald Trump’s religious faith. So when Donald Trump thinks about Jesus Christ, and god. This is the context which he he addresses it.

But I think if you had a real election and Jesus came down and god came down and said, I’m gonna be the scorekeeper here. I think we’d win there. I think we’d win in Illinois, and I think we’d win in New York, which is all places that did theory. Yeah. Absolutely.

I mean, who in New York? When you see what happened, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants pouring out all over Madison Avenue fifth Avenue. People are so angry. Even democrat politicians now are going after Biden. The mayor is going after him.

They’re all going after him. But who would say that this is acceptable? I think he can win New York. I think he can win New Jersey. I think we can win Virginia.

And California. I think he mentions Now we we could use words like delusional there, but it is interesting once again for the fact that eighty some percent of evangelical Christian voters look at him and say, God’s anointed. Yes. Absolutely. Yes.

Right.

God was around, I would win New York because he would because people are so pissed off at these immigrants.

Know, periodically, we come back to this point. Is Donald Trump a liar or is he delusional? Right? Now what I want to defend here is the proposition first of all, I think he is delusional. And I know a lot of folks disagree with me.

They just think he’s he’s lying about all this stuff. I think he has convinced himself of things like he could win Illinois, he could win New York. And he’s been saying that for years. But the reason why I think it is worse that he is delusional is going back to what we discussed before, the rape case. There’s a certain kind of date rapist who thinks what woman wouldn’t want me.

And then no signal that a woman sends on a date or the woman stands not on a date just like get away from me. He just won’t accept it. Of course, you want me. And then he forces himself on her. This is my model for how Donald Trump thinks about the United States.

Of course, Illinois would vote for me. Of course, New York would vote for me Who wouldn’t vote for me? Who would vote for the Democrats? If you watch any Trump rally, he always says the Democrats’ policies are so bad. Nobody would vote for them.

The votes come in The votes say that the voters chose the Democrats, not you, we literally watched him refuse to accept election results and say people must want me. This is your piece.

Right? Donald Trump is the ultimate date rape. It works on a lot of levels, you know.

Yeah. It is the most frightening thing to me about Donald Trump. He will not take no for an answer. If he gets back in power, what makes us think he’s gonna take no for an answer

mean, this is a point that we have talked about, you know, extensively. And we had these pieces, like, you were not sufficiently alarmed last week. And people were going, we are totally alarmed. We’ll know. Mhmm.

I do think that it is important to keep coming back to the fact that Donald Trump would have no constraints on him in a second president. Made it absolutely clear what he would do and by the way. Okay. So this this week, this is gonna be Liz Cheney’s week. Her book is rolling out.

She’s going to be everywhere. Was reading it over the weekend, actually, because we’re gonna have her on the podcast. And you know what? It strikes me once again about this. I’m I’m sorry.

This is a little bit of a digression. Know, you see the pictures of her as a little girl with president Ford and with president Reagan and with Breino president. I mean, she was I don’t know if it’s fair to call her, you know, GLP royalty because, you know, she wasn’t in the line of succession or anything, but certainly part of that is the nobility. I mean, to say that This was somebody who grew up, absolutely immersed in Republican politics, absolutely immersed in conservative politics. I mean, it is in her DNA.

She grew up around president. She grew up around the White House. She grew up around politicians. You know, her father was the vice president, Dick Cheney, etcetera, etcetera. I just think it’s worth remembering because I think we’ve we’ve gotten used to, like, Liz Cheney is very, very anti trump.

The fact that these warnings are coming from Liz Cheney, and Dick Cheney is still remarkable. And it it’s a sign of how quickly we normalize things. That the fact that this was the number three Republican in Congress. I’m sorry to dwell on this for a moment. But let let’s listen to, Liz Cheney.

And how far she’s willing to go in sounding the alarm of what might be coming down the road. This is Liz Cheney over the weekend.

You know, we’re facing a situation with respect to the twenty twenty four election, where it it’s an existential crisis. And we have to ensure that we don’t have a situation where an election that might be thrown into the house of representatives, is overseen by a Republican majority.

So you would prefer a democratic majority.

I believe very strongly in those principles and ideals that have defined the Republican Party. But the Republican Party of today has made a choice, and they haven’t chosen the Constitution. And so I do think it’s, it presents a threat if the Republicans are in the majority in January twenty twenty five.

Okay. Now I understand there’s gonna be a certain group of people who are gonna say, well, of course, that’s the bare minimum. No. This is Liz Cheney who’s been her entire life in Republican politics saying that I think it’s too dangerous, not just to have Donald Trump in power, but to have a Republican congress in power. And, of course, she’s talking about the book two scenarios.

Number one, a Republican Congress that might not agree to count the electoral votes as Donald Trump wanted, you know, back in twenty twenty one, or the possibility that that you, you know, our friends from no labels, by the way, friends. Here’s here’s my air quotes here. Might manage to fuck up the election to the point where nobody gets, two hundred and seventy electoral votes, and the House of Representatives chooses the next president. It is extraordinary to me listening to Liz Cheney. Say that about a Republican Congress.

It is. And You know, when I think about Liz Cheney, I feel hopeful. And the reason I feel hopeful is I don’t believe that people like me can change enough votes can persuade enough people to vote against Donald Trump. But I have some hope that Liz Cheney and some others like her have enough credibility with folks who otherwise would vote Republican would vote for the Republican presidential nominee to just move enough votes to swing enough stakes. Right.

So I think Liz Cheney is enormously important. It helps that she is Republican royalty. It helps that she has credibility Because as you can see, what’s going on right now is the Republican Party has been redefined as the cult of Trump, and therefore, anyone, no matter what their legacy, no matter what their previous royalty status was, who turns against Trump is dismissed as a quote, Rhino. So I think it’s very important that line that she said there Charlie Sykes said to John Dickerson. I’ve always supported the principles and ideals that defined past tense defined the Republican Party.

So she’s talking to other people who grew up in the party and still believe in conservative principles, things that were in the Republican platforms when Ma’el Reyan was the nominee. And she’s saying, If you are like me, you are normally a Republican voter. You believe in these things. This is not an occasion when you can afford to vote for this Republican nominee.

Okay. So I wasn’t actually gonna play this clip. I wasn’t gonna play the Chris Christie clip mainly because I like Chris Christie. I I hope he stays in the race. I made this clear.

I think a lot of the attention has now been shifting to is is, you know, Nikki Haley going to be the last person standing. And we we can spend some time in the future talking about that. There’s no question about it that to the extent there is something called, quote, unquote, momentum, which I think is often hyped and maybe even invented by the Pontocracy. She’s got it. But to your point, though, you know, there was a time, you know, not that long ago when when Chris Christie was was kind of a rock star in the Republican Party.

There were Republicans who didn’t like him. They’re still Republicans who were very bitter about him, you know, putting his armor on Barack Obama back in twenty twelve. I I know all this, but he continues to prosecute the case from a conservative Republican point of view in a very, very effective way. And this is Chris Christie. Who talks about this, but also distinguishes himself from Nikki Haley, and it’s worth listening to.

Let’s play Chris Christie.

You know, Nikki Haley says he was the right president for the right time and that for some reason, you know, drama and chaos seem to follow him. The reason is the new. He acts like someone who doesn’t care about our democracy, acts like someone who wants to be a dictator. He acts like someone who doesn’t care for the constitution. In fact, he’s even said himself he’d be willing to suspend the constitution if an election wasn’t telling in his direction.

Margaret, I was the only one on that stage going back to August. When I when we were asked, would you, support someone who, you know, was convicted of a felony. For president of the United States, Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis Vake Ramos Swamy, They all raised their hand. I did not.

Good point there, Will, you know. I mean, somebody’s gotta be making this point. You raised your hand when you said would you support a convicted felon for the presidency?

It is a great point. And so Charlie Sykes me if you ever have this feeling these days. What I’m having is Christie guilt. It is that I know that Chris Christie is the only candidate running in that primary who’s telling the truth about Donald Trump. He’s the only one with the courage to say that, even though he knows, He is Yeah.

Writing off all of the Trump vote and all of the Trump’s sympathetic vote and basically his chances of being the Republican nominee Meanwhile, Nikki Haley is straddling. Right? She’s trying to sort of say, well, we need to move on from Trump. But she has that line and Chris Christie nails her for it, which everywhere Nikki Haley goes these days, she says, you know, rightly or wrongly about Trump rightly or wrongly, chaos follows him. You all know it.

Yeah. How does that happen?

Yeah. It’s this passive description of the damage that he does. The chaos that he wreaks. And Christie calls her out for. So my guilt Charlie Sykes Christy is right.

Haley is a coward. But her cowardice is what allows her to have just the tiniest smidgen of a chance of beating Trump in that primary. This is right. I’m sitting here like moron. I’m not exactly supporting Nikki Haley, but I am rooting for her to knock off Trump.

I am too.

I don’t believe that Christie can do it, but it’s Christy who’s telling the truth. It’s Christie who’s saying what you and I know as right. This is my point. Do you feel this guilt?

Well, I yes. But I feel much guilt about so many things. It’s kinda hard to categorize it. But to your point about that weird formulation that Micahaley has that wherever he goes, there’s chaos, and it just it just follows in his way. It’s a little bit like saying, you know, wherever Jeffrey Dommar goes, he’ll learn

people found dead. There are people, you know, who

are in refrigerators and stuff. And it’s like wherever Jeffrey Dommar goes, there’s There’s these things that go wait. Wait. Wait. It’s not it’s it’s what he was doing.

What do you call a person who speaks three languages? Trilingual. Someone who speaks two, bilingual. Someone who speaks one American. Turns out that only twenty two percent of American speak a language other than English and home, but you can start learning a new language this year.

And be the exception, not the rule because With Babble, you start speaking a new language in just three weeks. Why Babble? Because Bulwark, instead paying hundreds of dollars for a private tutor or fooling yourself with language apps that are a little more than games, Babble’s quick ten minute lessons are designed by more than a hundred and language experts to help you start speaking a new language in as little as three weeks. Babble is designed by real people for real conversations. All of Babble’s tips and tools for learning a new language are approachable accessible rooted in real life situations and delivered with conversation based teaching.

I have to say that, Babble’s courses are incredibly convenient, and they really help me with real life conversation skills. I mean, it’s so easy to pick up on how to order food as for directions speak to them. Merchants without having to consult language apps while on vacation. And as some of you know, I actually have been spending the last few months with my French grandson. And as somebody who is a little shaky in the French, Babble has been an absolute lifesaver.

Studies from Yale Michigan State University and other continue to prove that Babble is better, for instance, one study found that using Babble for fifteen hours is equivalent to a full semester at college With over ten million subscriptions sold, Babble is real language learning for real conversations. Now here’s special limited time deal for our listeners to get you started right now. Get fifty five percent off your Babbel subscription, but only for our listeners at babbel dot com slash bulwark. Get fifty five percent off at babble dot com slash Bulwark spelled b a b b e l dot com slash bow work rules and restrictions may apply. So over the weekend, your favorite guy, and by the way, people who have not yet read your book, article slash.

We’re listening to the podcast about Lindsey Graham need to do that. Two very interesting things. That Lindsey Graham said. And I say this as somebody that is like, okay. We know exactly what Lindsey Graham is gonna say in any given circumstance.

We have two cuts here. One on Ukraine, but also since we’re on Liz Cheney. We’ve been talking about Liz Cheney. He’s asked about Liz Cheney and her book coming out and her, you know, warning about the existential threat that that Lindsey Graham’s BFF, Donald Trump poses to the country, and this is what Lindsey Graham said about Liz Cheney.

I think Liz’ hatred of Trump is real. I understand why people don’t like what he does and says at times, but in terms of actions and results. He was far better president for Biden. And if we have four more years of this list, Cheney, then we won’t recognize America and the world will be truly on fire.

And then he says, basically, this chain needs to get on board with Donald Trump because four more years of Joe Biden, and the world will literally be on fire. Right. Wow. I mean, he’s so

far down the rabbit hole.

Can you can you even see where he is now?

Sure. Sure. It’s This is something I talked about in the in the article about Graham, and it’s, but it’s true of lots of others. You hear these days so many Republican politicians saying Joe Biden is a mortal threat to the world, to the United States, the world Everything is on now say what you will about Joe Biden. Things are at least okay.

Like, inflation is too high. The borders are messed. But it’s not like we’re in a, you know, a world historical crisis. But these Republicans need to believe this, and they need to persuade their voters. That things are so on psychological need.

Right. Joe Biden has to be the devil because Donald Trump is the next closest thing to the devil. And so you’ve gotta make the alternative.

This is really an important point. So as Donald Trump becomes more and more awful, the psychological pressure to make Biden an existential threat rises. Right? Because you go, yeah, Donald Trump has all these things. He’s gonna destroy the constitution and all the all this other stuff, but Now I must believe that Biden will be worse.

Ron DeSantis Right. The the stakes get higher and higher. The pressure to demonize, it’s not enough to say. That Joe Biden is well, he’s old and he’s senile. No.

He’s old and he’s and he’s senile, but he’s also Satan on fire.

Right? He literally, but Jit Graham says the world will be on fire, and that’s what you have to believe to support this criminal, this criminal, Donald Trump, for president.

Alright. Now speaking of the world on fire, literally, you know, or Ukraine is on fire, And this morning before you and I began speaking, the White House put out a warning that the aid for Ukraine is going to dry up by the end of the year. I mean, so this is a real existential crisis for Ukraine. A lot of indications that Congress is striking its feast that, you know, that perhaps world attention has been shifted to the Middle East from Ukraine. One of the staunchest Republicans supporters of our aid Ukraine has been Lindsey Graham.

Mean, whatever we say about Lindsey Graham, and by the way, weeps out a lot.

He used

to be even more, is that he’s been pretty good on Ukraine up until yesterday. Now I’ve been paying as close attention as you have, but but I was really struck by what Lindsey Graham said about Ukraine. And again, we are it is December fourth. And by the end of the year is just a few weeks away. And this is what Lindsey Graham is saying yesterday

There’s no end to this wave of illegal immigration. You have to change your asylum laws and your parole laws to stop the flow. So I will not vote for any aid until we secure our own border reform a storm. Yeah. Reform parole is possible to do.

Democrats don’t wanna do it. All republicans wanna do it. I’m not helping Ukraine until we have ourselves.

I am not helping Ukraine until I get what I want on the border. He has coupled Do you find this surprising at all, Will?

I do. And I shouldn’t. Okay. But I do. Okay.

So It’s gonna where I’m at. Yeah.

Yeah. The position that Lindsey Graham is expressing now I’m not gonna vote for anything for their border until we fix our border. This was the position of Graham’s Republican isolationist opponents in the Senate and others like Ron DeSantis before. And Graham was the guy who said, no. We need to and Mitch McConnell and others who are hawks, said, no.

We’re going to support Ukraine regardless of anything because it’s the right thing to do, and that’s America’s role in the world. So Graham has shifted one of the questions in my mind, Charlie, when I was writing about Lindsey Graham’s capitulation to Donald Trump, which happened over the course of years is, is it contagious? That is to say, is it confined to Trump and supporting the authoritarian no matter what, but still holding out for Graham’s hawkish positions on foreign policy. Or does it start to seep into the foreign policy? Right.

Right. And what people need to understand about Graham’s capitulation in particular is his whole motivation for capitulating to Trump, I think. Some people think it was so he could be in the middle of the action. There’s some of that, but he did have genuine views about foreign policy. And they were, for example, dude, stand up the Russians and defend Ukraine.

Trump didn’t care about that. So Graham supports Trump on all his domestic crimes, but argues with him about sharing about it again. Right. At least there was that. That was the thing that justified the other capitulations.

Now what Graham is essentially doing, it looks to me, is he’s also shifting his position on foreign policy. And so it looks to me that the cowardice, the capitulation, the rationalization, they are contagious that this is an illustration of how Once you start behaving this way, you start making these concessions, it infects everything you do and think.

This holiday season, you might be looking for nutritious flavorful meals to fuel you on jam packed days. Factor, America’s number one ready to eat meal delivery service can help you eat well for breakfast lunch and dinner with chef prepared dietician approved ready to eat meals delivered straight to your door. You’ll save time and stay on track with your healthy lifestyle while tackling all your holiday to dos. You can cross meal prepping off your list this holiday season with factor. Skip the meal planning, the grocery shopping, the chopping, the prepping, cleaning up and get factors fresh never frozen meals delivered straight to your door.

They’re ready in just two minutes. So all you have to do is heat and enjoy. Treat yourself to high quality delicious meals over the holidays, choose from more than thirty five chef crafted meals every week support a healthy lifestyle and meet your meal preferences whether it’s calorie smart, vegan and veggie, protein plus, and more wholesome options. Looking for calorie conscious options over the holiday that don’t skimp on flavor, try delicious dietitian approved calorie smart meals, with around or less than five hundred and fifty calories per serving, or eat an extra boost to support your wellness goals and feel your best during the holidays, try protein plus meals with thirty grams of protein or more per serving. Factor is not just for dinner.

Count on extra convenience any time of the day with an assortment of more than fifty five add ons to suit various preferences and tastes. Choose from quick breakfast items, lunch to go, grab and go snacks, and ready to drink cold pressed juices, shakes, and smoothies this December. Get factored, enjoy eating well without the hassle. Simply choose your meals and enjoy fresh flavor packed meals delivered right to your door ready in just two minutes, no prep, no mess. Head to factor meals dot com slash the bulwark fifty, and use code the Bulwark fifty to get fifty percent off.

That’s code the bulwark fifty at factor meals dot com slash the Bulwark fifty to get fifty percent off. Okay. So let’s talk about Israel, Hamas. And some of the things over the weekend. I, have a big chunk of my newsletter devoted to the whole question of rape as rape.

And the, very, very slow walking that the UN women’s organization has taken in condemning hamas’ use of rape and sexual assault as a weapon. I mean, this has now been, I think, thoroughly, thoroughly documented. It’s really grisly gruesome stuff. And you’ve had a lot of, you know, people saying to feminist organizations around the world, why are you not speaking up about this? Why are you engaging in what about ism?

I have an excerpt from from a really wonderful piece that’s in slate magazine, your former publication slate, by by a group of, progressive women, who are saying, you know, calling on, you know, their their fellow women’s advocates, you need to speak up about what happened to these Jewish women. That this was a distinctive thing. Peace in the Guardian, making the same point. There’s been a lot of frustration about the UNs playing around word salads about all of this. And part of this came to a head yesterday on CNN, where Dana Bash is interviewing the head of the Progressive caucus or Representative GI.

About all of this. And this has gone viral, and I wanna get your your take on all of this. And Dana Bash is really pressing her. Why have you not spoken out? About the sexual assault of women, which is very much a Hamas policy.

And the controversy here, as you listen to this, is that she tries to change the subject. Danabash doesn’t let her and then talks about the need to balance your response, which is getting a lot of blowback from other Democrats and other progressives. But I wanna play this. This part of this exchange within Abash and representative Jiable.

Morally, I think we cannot say that one war crime deserves another. That is not what international humanitarian law says.

Okay. With with respect was just asking about the the women and you turned it back to Israel. I’m asking you about Hamas, in fact.

I already answered your question, Dana. I I said it’s horrific. And I think that rape is horrific. Sexual assault is horrific. I think that it happens in war situations.

Terrorist organizations like Hamas, obviously, are using these as tools. However, I think we have to be balanced about bringing in the outrageous

against Palestinians. Yeah.

Fifteen thousand Palestinians have been killed in Israeli air strikes, three quarters of whom are women and children.

And it’s horrible, but you’re you don’t see Israeli soldiers raping

Well, Dana, I think we’re not

Well, so this is an enormous topic. We’re not gonna be able to deal with all of it in this show, but I wanna just raise the fundamental point. There is a myth on the left called intersectionality. So the myth is that all of the oppressions are connected. Right?

Sex and racism and, you know, anti and Islamophobia and all that. And the myth is that we’re all in this together. The reality is life is very complicated. And so sometimes what you have is, in this case, a Palestinian organization, Hamas, committing a rape, committing many rapes of women who are Israeli. In the left, not the left.

I’ll just say there’s a certain part of the left, like the academic left the university left. In their hierarchy, the Palestinians are an oppressed people, and the Israelis are the oppressors. Right? And so that complicates the whole idea. Like, the rape is being committed by the so called oppressed people, by the Palestinians.

And When Jayapal says we need to be balanced, she was inadvertently acknowledging that in this case, there’s a tension between the two. And a lot of the problem that’s going on on the left. And I applaud my colleague, Dahliethwick, my former colleague, slate, who’s terrific, and and other folks who wrote that piece in slate. It’s a terrific piece. Yeah.

Mhmm. Their point is they don’t quite say it this way. They use the word identity. They say criticizing rape, denouncing rape should not depend on the identity of the perpetrator and the victim. They’re using the left term identity.

Identity construed as your identity is your race, is your ethnicity, is your nationality. Right? And what they’re essentially acknowledging is that it shouldn’t matter whether you are technically part of the oppressor group or the oppressed group. If you are raped, you are the victim. If you are a rapist, you are a perpetrator.

You should be punished accordingly. You should be denounced at a minimum. And so a lot of the paralysis on the left is not being able to speak this simple moral truth because of the contradiction with the oppression hierarchy.

Oh, I wanna emphasize though that a lot of this criticism is coming from people on the left who are, in fact, calling this out. I mean, this is one thing that No. You and I have talked about. You need to police your own side. Mhmm.

And this is happening I mean, this peace and slate that you talked about, and this was signed by Dahlia Lithwick, Mimi Roca, Jennifer Talb, Joyce Vance, Joyce Vance, And they write. Let me just read you a two paragraph here. Of all of the horrors coming out of the Israel Hamas conflict, among the most horrible are the barbaric murders, rapes, sexual assaults, and kidnappings of women. And young girls in Israel during the October seventh attack by Hamas. And yet, deepening this distressing event, there has been a disheartening silence about or worse denials of these evils, reticence from the voices here at home in the US who have in the recent past embraced other women who needed their support.

Israel and Jewish women find themselves isolated. For the past three decades, women have stood up for other women. When our sisters’ bodies and dignity were targeted and violated, women and allies of all ages and backgrounds organized, supported, and spoke out, except somehow not this time. So there is a real debate taking place. I think among progressive women about this silence, calling them out.

And it is vigorous. I thought it was interesting that Christine Pelosi, who is Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, tweeted out a real kind of a a shot at Jayapal. She wrote, I should not have to say this in twenty twenty three, but here we are.rape is rape. Do not minimize, excuse, balance, or both side sexual assault. That is victim blaming that we have spent decades trying to undo in the laws of the courts and the hearts and minds of the people.

So, you know, good on her.

Can I take one issue though with that political response from Christine Pelosi? Sure. This term both sides really exasperates me because sometimes what a person is saying, and here, I’m defending Jayapal. Okay? I’m gonna defend Primilajeval.

When she says balanced, right, she’s acknowledging that the two things are true. And she does say in that clip with Adabash in that interview. Says what Hamas did is wrong, is horrific. Then there’s the but. Right.

There’s the but. Okay. Okay. Yeah. I’m a big believer in the but because the but is acknowledging the other truth, which is this mass death of Palestinian civilians.

Right? It’s different from what happened in Israel. It is fundamentally different. Yeah.

But it’s There is not a moral equivalence. They’re not like two sides of a coin. No. Not.

Will. But Charlie, the asymmetries run-in both directions. Right? In Israel, what you had is the deliberate targeting rape murder of civilians. Right.

That is not what’s happening in Gaza. That’s absolutely true. At the same time, it is true. That the number of casualties in Gaza is massively greater than the number of casualties that Happy Day is real of a different kind, but enormous. And we’re seeing the images of all of these women and children in Gaza who are, like, getting hit by these shells.

These very large bombs being dropped no matter how well Israel tries to target, this has There’s a category difference. I don’t begrudge Camilla Japal acknowledging the moral fact that it is terrible that all these children are getting maimed and killed.

Yes. But her failure to denounce the Hamas sexual assault and targeting of women and girls saying this happens in war. No. She said it. But okay.

But that’s bullshit. This is the passive voice there. It doesn’t just happen anymore any more than just chaos. Just, you know, it happens to be around Donald Trump. Hamas made the abuse of women as a matter of policy.

And I think it is legitimate to call out the Me Too movement and said, okay. You have been calling out the targeting and the degradation of women. And yet there is a reluctance to do it or to put it in some Charlie Sykes, bad things happen to a lot of people during bad times. No. And I think that that’s why people are focusing on all this.

The UN Women’s group was not able to condemn. The Hamas sexual assault of women and and rape for fifty seven days. Why was that will? Why were they unwilling to do that? Well, because a lot of bad things are happening because bombs are also falling.

So, therefore, the fact that you are raping and and shooting women in the head and things like that and breaking that come on. Why did it take them fifty seven days? Look, I have

a lot of issues with the UN, with various UN organizations. But they are certainly in the grip of this sort of oppressor, you know, hierarchy mentality that probably inhibits a lot of NGOs from speaking out when they should. But I think we will have a healthier society and healthier conversation when we’re willing to acknowledge all of the asymmetries And it’s it shouldn’t be a crime to say, you know, that I’m gonna say this is true and that’s true that I know it’s very convenient for people who oppose moral equivalence to call this both sizing. But sometimes it is just a fact that there are horrific.

There’s not both sides in the making rape and sexual assault a policy. This was what Dana Bache said. Israel soldiers are not going in with orders, rape as many Palestinian women as you can, and then kill them.

Let me add to that though. This is not entirely new. The phenomenon of, right, abuse of women in general has been endemic to not just human civilization, but liberation movements. All over the world, there are these movements to sort of liberate this and that oppressed people in which the movement itself, the men are abusing the women. That this just happens all the time.

And Didn’t just happen. Why are you using a passive voice? We talked

it’s just a reality that people think. Yes. Alright. I’m gonna take your caution here. I’m gonna use the best ways.

The men are abusing the women in various ways. And people who consider themselves progressive and believe in liberation must not turn a blind eye to that phenomenon even when it happens within liberation movements.

Okay. So shall I tell you the story that really bothers me? Anyway, we’re gonna move on from this. But and again, this comes back to the and you and I have struggled with this as well talking about this that it is possible, I think, legitimately, to be very critical of Israeli government policy without being any Semitic. Okay.

So, I mean, there are people who say that if you’re anti zionist or anti somatic, I’m I’m willing to make all kinds of distinctions here. Alright? But what you’re seeing, and it is amazing to me. I mean, it may maybe I it shouldn’t be amazing at all. How many of these, you know, pro Palestinian protests have now turned on Jewish businesses that are being targeted because they are Jewish businesses.

Which is not the same as criticizing Israeli government policy. And then you have this journal where you saw this story out of Virginia. You’re a virginian. Right?

No. Sarah Longwell, but that’s okay. Close close enough. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah.

D m v.

Okay. So here it is the United Jewish community of the Virginia Peninsula. Something that happened over the the weekend. I just wanna read this. The Jewish community of the Virginia Peninsula is shocked and alarmed at love life placemaking.

This is a non profit organization. Their decision to cancel a menorah lighting scheduled for the second Sunday art and music festival on December tenth in Williamsburg, claiming that it did not want to appear to choose sides in the Israel Hamas conflict. Okay. So they said, so we’re not gonna have a mineral lighting. So the statement is, to be clear, the mineral lighting which was to be led by a local community rabbi had nothing to do with Israel or the conflict yet appallingly The event organizer claimed that a Hanukkah celebration would send a message that the festival was, quote, supporting the killing bombing of thousands of men, women, and children, unquote, And even went a step further by offering to reinstate the event if it was done under a banner calling for AC’s fire, and then they point out, we should be very clear It is anti Semitic to hold Jews collectively responsible for Israel’s policies and actions and to require a political litmus test for Jews participation in community events that have nothing to do with Israel.

Wow. I mean, the what’s the mentality that says, we don’t like what Israel is doing So we’re gonna stop local Jews from having a Hanukkah mineral lighting.

Okay. I’m with you on this. First of all, I have a much tighter standard for anti Semitism than most of my friends do. And that is I think it is fine to criticize Israel. I can argue with you about your criticism, but it’s not anti Semitic for you to criticize the government of Israel, the policy of Israel.

I’m willing to go further, Charlie. I’m willing to say if you wanna say there shouldn’t be a Jewish state or a Muslim state or a Christian state anywhere. That’s not anti semitic either. But Yeah. To your point, once you cross that line and you’re going after people who are just Jewish, yeah, that’s But I think what’s going on in this case is an insidious phenomenon that we should pay a lot of attention to.

And that is there’s people who would boycott a business because it is Jewish, and that’s just Mandy Smithic. But there’s other people who would cancel an unevent because it has some Jewish overtones and at look, times are very controversial right now, and we don’t wanna, you know, create controversy. That is capitulating to We’re not living in in Nazi Germany. But when there starts to be a popular movement against a minority, like Jews. It could be based on anything.

It can be based on a on a war going on somewhere. And when other people start saying, you know, We don’t wanna have this Jewish event at our venue. Right? Or we don’t wanna, like, send people there. We don’t wanna endorse this thing because it might be controversial Now you’re letting the bigots win.

Right? Now you’re letting the bigotry infect you. Even if you don’t call yourself or think of yourself as a big Oh, I completely agree

with you. And by the way, speaking of other things, did you see that story out of the Texas Republican Party? No. Which is this is not a parody. I’m gonna read you from the Texas Tribune account, which I have in my newsletter this morning.

Again, this is not a joke, this is not a parody. The Texas GOP rejects ban on associating with Nazi sympathizers. They actually had a specific vote. Two months after a prominent conservative activist and fundraiser was caught hosting white supremacist Nick Fuentes, By the way, so did Donald Trump. Leaders of the Republican Party of Texas have voted against barring the party from associating with no Nazi sympathizers and Holocaust deniers in a thirty two to twenty nine vote on Saturday.

Members of the Texas GOP’s executive committee stripped a pro Israel resolution clause that would have included the ban, delivering a major blow to a group that has called for the party to confront its ties to groups that have recently employed elevated or associated with Outspoken white supremacists or anti Semitic figures. Okay. So we’ve delivered a lot of time today talking about the need for the left and progressives to police their own ranks. Holy crap. Here is the official Republican Party of the state of Texas.

This is the lowest hanging possible fruit. Yes. We are not gonna associate with known Nazi sympathizers, and they voted thirty two to twenty nine saying now, can’t you can’t can’t do that? I mean, it’s there’s no there’s no subtly here.

I don’t know the backstory on this, but presumably if you can’t get a vote for that measure, what you’re essentially inadvertently acknowledging is that that’s a standard too high for your party. Right? You you wouldn’t be able to keep the people in the room who are already in the room. Yeah. You wouldn’t you have too many organizations that you still want to associate with that don’t meet that basic standard of not being overt bigots.

It’s a little bit like the whole trump phenomenon, like, where they’ve they’ve just lowered the bar successively Oh, yeah. In order to justify over and over it. Right. And so would have to expel not just George Santos, but Paul Gossar out of Congress. Made Marjorie Taylor Green.

Well, you got that whole trump thing.

You know,

the Trump dinner with Elon and you know, e Elon and Kanye, right, has an age well. Right? Because, you know, I mean, Kanye has clarified a few things, you know, yee, you know, the It’s just why nobody talks about him anymore. Not even the Republican Party says, you know, Elon Kanye Trump that that that again, that that also didn’t age. Very well.

But, see, the the real irony here and this is not speculative. K. So they vote thirty two to twenty nine, the executive committee of the official Republican Party of Texas against a ban on associating with known any semites and nazis and everything, which should have been, like, why even bring it up. However, If there was a resolution saying, basically, excommunicating anyone that had anything to do with Liz Cheney or Adam Kinzinger, it would have sailed through. You know, it’s like, okay.

We can’t, like, have limits on associating with Nazi sympathizers But if you’re subscribing to the Bulwark or if you’re where if you’re hanging out or if you’re buying Liz Cheney’s book, you’re out of here, man.

Right. And this takes us right back to the beginning because what’s essentially happened is that Trump is for these people, the new Jesus. Right? And this is Trump is the deity at the center of their religion. You you may not turn against Donald Trump.

But Jesus, god, anything in the Bible, anything about you know, treating others the way you would want to be treated, about loving the stranger. All that stuff were just chucking out the window. In fact, we, you know, we would never apply that as a moral standard for who can be in the Republican party. Right? Over bigotry is fine.

But our god, the orange god, he must never be betrayed.

The golden calf. Okay. So is there anything we haven’t covered today? Because I would I had a lot of anxiety about today’s show that there was just too much stuff out there that I wasn’t able to get to. We didn’t get to Ron DeSantis, dancing, and weaving, and the various other Republicans that are going on the Sunday shows saying that Right.

Yeah. Trump may, you know, maybe anti constitutional anti democratic and overtly fascist, but, yeah, I’m I’m on board. I mean, this process of that we talked about earlier has really accelerated. I know that we could have doubled the length of the stow talking about all that.

Right. Let me pick on one guy. Than one guy. Yeah. James Langford, because we’ve been on this theme of religion and faith.

James Langford is the, Republican senator from Oklahoma. And on this podcast. And he presents himself as a very sincere Christian. Other people say that he is that. He runs, I think, the Senate prayer group with Chris Coons, So he’s supposed to be sincere and he’s supposed to be religious.

He goes on George Stephanopolos this weekend, and Stephanopoulos Does his question? I love Stefanopolis for this. Anybody comes on, he asks them this question. The question is, would you support Donald Trump for president of future party’s nominee? But before he says this, Stephanopoulos reads off the litany of of the stuff that Trump is repeating lies about the election.

He’s called the people convicted that at January sixth insurrection hostages. He faces ninety one felony counts. He said that the former chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Mark Kelly, should be executed, advocated terminating the constitution, all that stuff He reads this preamble and then says to Langford, given all that, if trump is your nominee, would you support him? And James Langford, mister Christian, says in response. Yes.

He would. He says that is not a hard choice.

Oh, that’s not a hard choice. She I could understand saying that’s a really hard choice, but but it’s like, no. We have gone so far down this that we’re just like, yeah.

But we’re going to see many other Lancfords. Let’s let’s assume Trump gets nominated as is extremely likely. All of these self styled moral conservatives They are going to do exactly what Langford did. They’re gonna say, I disagree with Biden on the border, on inflation, on a couple other things. And so I’m gonna vote for the guy who literally called suspending the constitution.

This is an authoritarian party. It’s not just Donald Trump who has to be kept out of the White House. Lankford and all of these other Republicans to the extent possible need to be I mean, Langford’s not gonna lose because he’s in Oklahoma. But Any Republican who supports Donald Trump for president needs to be voted out of office. This is a basic moral requirement for being a citizen of this country today.

You may be conservative. I disagree with the Democratic party on a lot of issues, but we cannot afford to have this authoritarian party in power again.

Well, it’s an indication of what they’re willing to swallow and what they would be willing to swallow in a second Trump presidency. Anyone who is thinking that a Republican united state senate would serve as a guardrail or a limiting, you know, a, you know, the grown ups in the room when Trump was trying to undermine all these things. I think this story that If James Langford thinks this is an easy decision, even James Langford is gonna vote against Trump’s nominee to be attorney general, or, you know, the next FBI director. Do you think he’s gonna stand up against him? So that quote of Langford, when I first heard that, I thought, okay, this is still shocking.

But it’s no longer surprising. It’s shocking that a guy like that would go along with it, but it’s no longer surprising because we’ve gone through this for the last seven years, and you’re you’re exactly right that you’re going to see a lot more of this. And so you can still be shocked at the moral and political surrender that goes on here. But don’t be surprised because this is the Republican Party, which is thoroughly internalized, all of this. And in going forward.

And, again, to your point about the election, I think this is what Liz Cheney is also getting at. These folks, If they’ve gone this far and they’ve swallowed this much, if you think that they are going to stand and defend the constitution, when Trump is actually back in the presidency, You’ve been smoking something because it’s just that’s not gonna happen. Well said. Well said Charlie Sykes that happy note, Happy Monday again, Will. I appreciate it every single week, and thank you all for listening to today’s Bulwark podcast.

I’m Charlie Sykes will be back tomorrow, and we’ll do this all over again. Bulwark podcast is produced by Katie Cooper, and engineered and edited by Jason Brown.