Karen Tumulty: The Sununu Effect in New Hampshire
Episode Notes
Transcript
New Hampshire voters are famously contrarian, and the non-MAGA set is showing up for Haley and Christie ahead of the first-in-the-nation primary. Plus, a Rosalynn Carter appreciation, and the ‘Lord of the Flies’ vibe in the House. Karen Tumulty joins Charlie Sykes from New Hampshire.
show notes:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/11/20/rosalynn-carter-place-in-history/
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors and omissions. Ironically, the transcription service has particular problems with the word “bulwark,” so you may see it mangled as “Bullard,” “Boulart,” or even “bull word.” Enjoy!
-
Welcome to the Bulwark podcast. I’m Charlie Sykes. It is two days before Thanksgiving. I think we are kind of ramping down for the holiday. I hope everybody He has a great Thanksgiving.
-
But, before we descend into the long weekend, I wanted to get a view from well, from the front lines, from the field. And so we are very fortunate to be joined by the Washington Post’s Karen Tumbley who is on the ground in New Hampshire this morning. So first of all, welcome back to the podcast, Karen.
-
Well, thank you very much, and happy Thanksgiving.
-
So let’s talk about what you are seeing and doing because you have been very, very busy. You’ve seen Nikki Haley action. You’ve seen Chris Christie. You’re going to see Ron DeSantis. So Just give me a sense of what’s happening up in New Hampshire because the conventional wisdom is, okay, it’s Donald Trump’s party.
-
He’s going to win. There’s a race for second Niki’s having her moment. So let’s start with Nikki Haley. Is there a little bit of Nikki momentum going on there?
-
Yeah, I think there is. And, you know, the other thing that I’m seeing here is a lot of very curious voters. And, of course, in New Hampshire, you have not only the Republican base, but independence can vote in the primary.
-
Mhmm.
-
And there’s no Democratic primary. So to the degree they vote, they’re all gonna be playing in the Republican primary. And there are just already and this is a holiday week. A lot of people showing up to hear these people, but I think the most single most interesting factor. The bell of the ball up here is governor Chris Sununu.
-
Who is appearing with all of these other candidates. And he, as you know, has broken with Trump. He is extremely popular up here, and he is making it pretty clear that he is going to endorse somebody probably certainly one of these three and that when he does, He’s going as he put it with me yesterday, a hundred and ten percent. Now, you know, you can say endorsements don’t matter. And, you know, as popular as he is, you know, does it rub off on other people?
-
But what he has is an incredibly deep and robust network. You know, he’s a two generation name up here. And, you know, that really could, I think, potentially make a difference.
-
Well, that’s always the big question is whether or not popularity is trans favorable. You know, we have the Republican governor of Iowa that has endorsed Ron DeSantis, you know, despite the fact that he’s running double digit behind Donald Trump. Donald Trump is very, very unhappy about it. New Hampshire is just a different beast though. I mean, I think we just gotta step back.
-
And New Hampshire voters are just notoriously contrarian and independent. Right? I mean, there’s there’s something distinctive about the New Hampshire prime it’s not just it’s the first primary. It’s not just the sort of, you know, weird artifact of American democracy. So give me a sense of who these people are that are showing up and what they’re looking for.
-
Well, New Hampshire has a history, in both parties of kinda whacking back at whoever wins idle. They they love to do that. They’re they’re sort of contrarian. And I do think that where in Iowa, you know, you have a huge evangelical Christian base. Here voters across the board, I think, tend to be a little more libertarian, a little more independent minded.
-
I mean, this is a place where it says live free or die on the license plates. You know, they are also saying because the Democrats are snubbing them this time around and putting their first primary in South Carolina, you do get a sense that they are quite eager to protect their tradition and their first in line status. And certainly, the governor is quite eager. Their primary is relatively early. I think it’s what?
-
Like, eight days after Iowa. So it it’s nine weeks away, and it it’s starting to feel pretty close.
-
Okay. So, I mean, the Republican Party is really Trump’s party. He’s got more than sixty percent of the vote. Are New Hampshire Republicans different than the national Republicans? I mean, I that that’s what I’m trying to get out of here is the the people who are showing up to hear Nikki Haley and and Chris Christie.
-
Clearly, they have not all bought into Donald Trump. Is the New Hampshire Republican party significantly less manga than other states?
-
Again, I am talking to people who are showing up to hear Nikki Haley. So these are not and they were wearing these little buttons that say NH heart emoji NH. So it’s a luck of the draw that her initials are perfect for a little slogan up here. But I do get the sense, like I said, that a lot of people are shopping. And the the thing is too, if you look at the poll numbers.
-
Here’s the big question for me. I mean, if you look at the poll numbers, if you were to take Nikki Haley and add it to Chris Christie, and add it to DeSantis. All of these people are kinda within the margin of error of each other. But if you add it all three together against Donald Trump, you got a race. So another question is Is anybody gonna step aside?
-
Is anybody gonna drop out? Because as long as there are all three there, it works to Trump’s advantage.
-
Oh, very much so. I mean, this is the replay of twenty sixteen. Are you working under the assumption that all three go right up through the New Hampshire primary? That if there’s a sorting, it would only take place afterwards. What do you think?
-
You definitely get the sense that both Haley and Christie are in it. I mean, Christie’s ignoring Iowa. He’s putting all of his chips here. I don’t know if the Santis doesn’t do well in Iowa where he is putting most of his resources, you know, there may be a way to nudge him out. But again, I have not seen him up here.
-
We still have nine weeks, but I think if any of the three is likely to be nudged either out or to the sidelines.
-
We just sent us in. Right. Okay. Ron DeSantis supporters, though, they’re not necessarily just going to break for another non Trump candidate. You know, my sense is looking at some of these numbers that Frona Sanders drops out that Donald Trump is basically their their second choice that he was sort of maga without the baggage.
-
So you take him out of there and then might as well go with the with the original manga with the, you know, the o g? What do you think?
-
Yeah. Exactly. And also Chris Christie who’s been the most kind of direct in attacking Trump up here on the thesis that there’s a very different electorate here and that this is a way to bring in some of those independents who can vote in the primary here. But you have seen his negatives go up very sharply with the Republican base.
-
So what is Nikki Haley’s message there? I I mean, trying to get a sense of how they are pitching themselves. I mean, look, we know that they’re politicians, so they’re gonna pitch themselves differently to New Hampshire voters than to say Iowa evangelicals. And something’s working for Nikki right now. We’ll get to Chris Christie in a moment.
-
What is her pitch why Republicans should ditch Donald Trump for her, or does she not put it in those terms?
-
She uses a lot of the lines that we’ve heard her use quite effectively on the debate stage. She talks a lot the need for a generational change in this party. She talks a lot about the need to get beyond the drama. And she also digs pretty deep into foreign policy. She is really the the only candidate who is touting her credentials there.
-
She has a really clear lines of difference with the other candidates on on Ukraine. So does she bring up Ukraine on the stump? Ukraine and Israel?
-
She does. The way she portrays it is that this is a unified field. That what happens in Ukraine is gonna affect what happens in the Middle East, and that’s gonna affect what happens in Taiwan. That, you know, all of these autocrats are watching each other that if Russia prevails in Ukraine, that’s gonna embolden China. If the United States doesn’t stand up, for Israel, that’s going to you know, the argument she makes is this is one issue, not three.
-
What kind of a reception does she get though? How do Republicans in New Hampshire react to this? I’m putting this in the context of this rising isolationism, America first, that you’re seeing in polls, you’re seeing in Congress. And New Hampshire has kind of an isolationist streak, anti war streak. So how does it play there?
-
Again, I have mostly seen her in front of audiences who have come out to hear.
-
It’s like a preselected to agree with her.
-
Right. But they are receptive. And the other thing that she does is talks about the border as an issue that is not just a southern issue, but a northern issue. And that is something to know about here in New Hampshire where you know, they have had a big border problem, which is fentanyl coming in over the border over the northern border. Yes.
-
So border security does have a resonance up here that I think all of the candidates would do well to understand.
-
Okay. So does she raise this always feels surreal when we’re talking about this republican primary because, of course, you know, the great orange elephant looming over all of this the fact that, you know, Donald Trump is the front runner is the, you know, expected nominee, and he’s facing multiple criminal Charlie Sykes. And seems to become I’m trying to finish this sentence without using the word fascist, but I’m going to fail. You know, continues to signal exactly what kind of regime that he would bring in if it was, trump two point o. Does she talk about that at all, or is that just something that I know that Chris Christie raised it, but is anyone other than Chris Christie?
-
Talk about the fact that the Republican Party might actually nominate a convicted felon certainly somebody who is under criminal indictment. Does that ever come up anywhere other than a Chris Christie event?
-
No, Charlie. And that is what really struck me last night because Chris Christie is the only one of the candidates who is talking about the charges against Trump on their merits. Nikki Haley kind of tries to sidestep it. She talks about how well they don’t treat the Democrats this way, and that’s not, you know, it’s a deflection. She certainly, though, doesn’t go as far as Viveik Ramaswamy.
-
Name, by the way, I’m not hearing much here to say Trump should be pardoned, but it really is only Chris Christie. Who actually deals with the substance of the charges against Donald Trump again on their merits.
-
Let’s talk a little bit about Chris Christie. I talked about this with my colleague, Will Saletan on our podcast yesterday. Chris Christie’s made it very, very clear that he was basically a one man wrecking ball going after Donald Trump. It seems to me, at least from the outside, that he’s really sort of stepping into this role that he’s kind of sharpening his critique I don’t know. How does he appear on the stump?
-
Because, I mean, you know, I’m sitting here in Wisconsin thinking, you know, Chris Christie is this magnificent and beast who’s also seems like the happy warrior. He seems to be enjoying himself. And he seems to actually when he talks about, say, you know, moral clarity, the moral clarity, of calling out dangers to democracy. It feels like the longer that he’s in the race, The sharper his critique is. Do you have any sense of this?
-
Oh, I absolutely agree. And he’s also at least you know, from what I’ve seen lately, just the most engaging candidate on the stump. And you’re right. He is a happy warrior. He’s funny.
-
I also find that he is taking on not only Trump, but his opponents his other opponents on the primary. I mean, he is telling people, look, you know, these other people that I’m running against they will tell you they will send the army into Mexico. They’re not gonna do that. They’re not gonna be shooting people on-site at the border. That’s just not the kinda country we are, but, you know, that basically telling them they are selling you a line.
-
Again, it’s an argument that nobody else is making. He also talks quite a bit about his own experiences as governor, somebody asked him last night, would you appoint Democrats to your cabinet? He said, I appointed Democrats to key positions when I was governor. I I was the governor of a blue state. So he’s making the electability argument, I think, as well.
-
The question is, though, the more he does all of this, the more he drives up his negatives, what the Maga makes.
-
Well, right. And that’s why this is great political theater, but is not gonna end up. I have spoiler alert with him getting the Republican nomination. I I thought you tweeted about something that he said last night. He’s also willing to take on the Republicans in Congress including the the new speaker, Mike Johnson.
-
Let’s play this little clip where he talks about all the celebration of the fact that, the the new speaker managed not actually crash the government and manage to not shut down the government. This was Chris Christie.
-
You look at Washington, these jokers take a victory lap for not closing the government and think like they deserve a big round of applause for that. Congratulations. You didn’t close the government. You’re supposed to be down there running. Well, I don’t think that deserves any great round of applause, but they do because they haven’t had a president who has worked with them and made them understand that our job is to work for you.
-
So tell me what you thought that was interesting.
-
I just thought it was, interesting to hear a Republican candidate for president repeatedly referring to the Republicans who are running the house as clown. You know?
-
Right. It’s Well
-
I think he’s pretty much expressing how a lot of people feel about Congress right now.
-
Now you did, write a piece a little while ago. I wanna get back to Rhonda Sanderson a moment. The Mike Johnson might be more skillful than than expected. That was written before the final deal went through. And
-
By the way, second paragraph of that piece is you know, more more skillful than expected. That’s a pretty low bar.
-
Yeah. That’s a very low bar. Well, and and actually, since then, I mean, so we had that one one deal that didn’t down the government. And then it was just one clown car crash after another under the speakership, including the failure to pass. Any of these individual appropriation bill, they couldn’t even get the rules through.
-
And then they essentially just kinda threw up their hands and went home. There’s no indication so far. Well and correct me if you have other evidence on this. Weirdly enough, and we live in these weird times, There’s no indication that all of this chaos and dysfunction is actually costing Republicans in the polls. There seems to be this massive disconnect between what’s happening in the presidential race or in the Congress.
-
And then you like, see how voters are processing it, and it doesn’t seem to register.
-
I think in part, it’s because voters have gotten so cynical about Congress ever getting anything done other than lurch from crisis to crisis.
-
That’s become normalized. It is sort of assume that it’s going to be like this?
-
Exactly. And and going back to Mike Johnson, I mean, Mike Johnson and speaker seems far more pragmatic than Mike Johnson as backbenture was. First of all, the people who are causing all the chaos on the house floor and not letting them proceed to even pass what they call the rule to get a bill onto the floor. Are the exact same people who keep claiming they want regular order? What we have with this very short window before the next time.
-
We look at whether the government closes down. Is, you know, could they at least try and pass one or two of these twelve appropriations bills which I think is something they haven’t done since I believe twenty six.
-
It’s been a while.
-
They just keep rolling up all government spending into these hairball bills that get written in the leadership offices with no transparency. What the heck is the appropriations committee? Do it?
-
Well, I always wonder this. Now, so you you mentioned that that Mike Johnson seems more pragmatic as speaker. And and, yeah, in the in the first few weeks, he seems that. But on the other hand, he presides over a caucus that is anything but pragmatic And this credit, sort of this Rubik’s cube, how do you get things done? How do you get the age for Israel?
-
How do you get the age for Ukraine without you know, being blown up by the same people that blew up Kevin McCarthy, and without relying heavily on democratic votes. I mean, I I frankly don’t see how he does it. Now he may want to get it done, and he may have a, you know, this mild demeanor, but he’s never chaired a committee. He has no experience doing this. I mean, this is a guy who is way out of his depth in a situation where even if you were a master legislator, master legislator.
-
You’d probably have a hard time navigating this.
-
Well, he’s gonna need the demo and he got the Democrats to get the government to remain open. The thing about it is because I think the MAGA Republicans in the house still view him as one of their own. I think even they have to realize how mortifying it was for the country to see them go three weeks without being able to come up with a speaker. You do get a sense that Johnson’s gonna get a little more leeway than Kevin McCarthy got to do exactly what Kevin McCarthy did and got fired. For.
-
If he ends up doing exactly the kind of thing that Kevin McCarthy would have would have done, but is it Mike Johnson’s house or is it Matt Gates’s house?
-
Gosh. Who wants that house?
-
Holy exactly. Yes.
-
It’s nobody’s house. You know, it’s lord of the flies in there.
-
Okay. Let’s go back to new new Hampshire. I’m really intrigued by the role of Chris Sanuno. You said that he’s kind of the bell of the ball. Very, very popular governor.
-
It’s a very Small State. He knows everybody. He’s got these deep networks. He’s showing up with the various candidates, and he’s going to go in as you point out a hundred and ten percent for her it is. I’m guessing it’s not going to be Ron DeSantis.
-
So is he waiting to see who is the strongest opponent to Trump I mean, if we go into January and Nikki Haley continues to rise, what do you sense? What does he say at the events that he shows up at?
-
He just keeps reminding voters of how important they are, but surely he is taking an assessment of who’s got the better shot. You know, and there’s also something to think about here. And again, he insists this is not part of his calculation, but, you know, say you had a female governor from South Carolina get the nomination She could pick worse running mates than a New England governor from a swing state.
-
I know.
-
You know, who knows what what all is gonna go into his calculation. But I do think he does bring a lot He is one of the more articulate people I’ve ever heard in making the case against Donald Trump. And he’s not afraid to do it. And you do have, as as he was saying yesterday, a network where whoever he endorses. He can introduce them to every selectman and every school board member.
-
And, you know, all the people that the sununu network going back two generations has cultivated. We
-
had to clarify that that even though he’s broken with Donald Trump, it makes the case against Donald Trump, he is among those Republicans who has said that he will support the nominee. He tried to finesse that months ago by saying, well, I was with the nominee, but it’s not going to be Donald Trump, so I don’t really have to make that statement. What does he say now? Now that it’s, increasingly likely that it’s going to be Donald Trump.
-
He is not being asked that anymore. And, of course, I mean, come on, Charlie Sykes know, I mean, if Trump’s the nominee, they’re all gonna support Donald Trump.
-
Well, when you say all of them see, this is what’s interesting is that cognitive shift from saying, you know, this man is He’s crazy. He’s a danger to the republic. He’s become detached from reality. Yes. But by all means, I will vote to put him back in the Oval Office.
-
I mean, it’s just I mean, it we know that partisanship and tribalism can be a hell of a drug, but this year is really, it’s amazing watching some of these guys make the case against Trump now, and then you know, with the gravitational pull of partisan loyalty coming back home after it’s all over.
-
And then what all we’re gonna hear as well is not Joe Biden. You know, it was interesting. I was sitting next to one voter yesterday at the Haley event, and she was saying she’s a Staunch Republican. She said her kids are both Democrats, but she said, I don’t know what I do if it comes down to Trump versus Biden, because I can’t vote for Trump, and I can’t vote for Biden, and I’m gonna go to the polls and write somebody in.
-
These are the double haters. Yeah.
-
Yeah. And and I’m wondering too. I mean, our assumption has always been that having Trump on the ballot drives turnout on both sides. But if we end up having two nominees that at least all indications now are people just aren’t enthusiastic about. I wonder if turnout just goes through the floor.
-
Jeez. Yeah. Well, it’s hard to predict what the mood in the country is going to be. So talk about, Joe Biden for a moment. It’s gonna be very, very hard to get even some of these, anti trump Republicans, to vote for Joe Biden, but We had another one of these panic polls this week, showing that Donald Trump is actually leading Joe Biden his approval ratings, being down at, pretty much historic lows.
-
Give me your sense of, like, what is Joe Biden’s problem? Why is Joe Biden having such a hard time connect with the American public. What do you think is going on here?
-
I think number one, if if you’re talking about why he personally is having trouble connecting is age. Mhmm. Ronald Reagan had a supposed age issue. When he was nominated, he was three weeks short of his seventieth birthday. I mean, when he was inaugurated, rather, I think personally people are worried about his age, but I do think there’s just kind of a sour mood in the country that yes there’s economic growth and yes inflation has slowed down, but you go to the grocery store and everything still looks pretty expensive.
-
And the world is outside our borders, just looking like such a scary place. But I honestly think that poles this far out. And when you don’t have an actual defined race I genuinely don’t think they are dispositive.
-
Okay. Because so many voters are still in denial about the fact that it’s going to be Trump versus Biden.
-
Yeah. And also, an election is a choice. Right. So if you ask people, what do you think of Joe Biden? It’s one thing.
-
But if you say, if you, you know, if you gotta look at these two people and vote for one, I just think these numbers are just too close. And in most people’s mind, an election that is a year away is still too theoretical.
-
Does Joe Biden have a Jimmy Carter problem?
-
Not like Jimmy Carter had a Jimmy Carter problem. I mean
-
There was that perception that he, you know, people might not have dysliked him, but that he was kind of perceived to Bulwark, did not bestride the world’s state in a relatively forceful way. And then there was just the accumulation of reasons to be dissatisfied with what was going on in in the world. There are presidents that connect with with the American public. The American public says, I am with that guy. I trust him even if I disagree with him.
-
There seems to be a lack of connection. And I know that Democrats are immensely frustrated by this, because they said, but look, Look at all of the programs and policies he has put into place. You know, they are all successful or they say that they pull well. And yet, for some reason, this is not translating into board for Joe Biden the person.
-
But Jimmy Carter had so many specific crises going on at the same time. I mean, we had Americans being held hostage in the Iranian embassy, and Ted Copel counting it down the number of days every night. We had lines at the gas pump.
-
Well, we we have hostages in Gaza.
-
It still, I think, feels like a far off thing. To and again, who knows how this plays out over the months? But Yeah. And by the way, it’s worth pointing out when the Americans were first taken hostage in Iran. Carter’s numbers
-
they rallied around
-
him. And that basically killed Ted Kennedy’s challenge of him in his primary challenge. But the fact that it dragged on was what really, I think, killed him.
-
Well, and and the fact that they had the one year anniversary for the election. So speaking of Jimmy Carter, I’m sorry to bring him in in sort of a negative way. You wrote a wonderful, appreciation for Rosalyn Carter. So let’s talk a little bit about the the former first lady and what she represented as a, you opened your column by noting that the former first lady, who died on Sunday. Were the same gown to her husband’s presidential inaugural balls in nineteen seventy seven that she wore to his gubernatorial inauguration this was a gun that was actually bought off the rack in Georgia.
-
That still seems kind of refreshing. And in the context of the times, it was kind of a moment of, like, someone who was like us. So talk to me a little bit about her because you’ve written a fantastic book about Nancy Reagan, Roslyn Carter, very, very different first lady.
-
Yes. And this decision of hers to wear the same dress that she had worn six years before and had worn at least once in between was believe it or not criticized at the time. How dare she?
-
Yeah. The New York Times was kinda sniffy about it. Right? Muders were heard from members of the fashion industry who felt the first lady Could ill afford such a sentimental gesture?
-
But, you know, part of it spoke to her humility and her frugality. I mean, this is the first lady who had let us know that she was bringing her sewing machine to the White House. But I think too, it was a signal to the country that Roselyn Carter did not intend to be just an ornament on her husband’s presidency. And, certainly, we have seen that many of the first ladies in history and especially first ladies in modern history were in fact highly influential in their husband’s presidency, but the deal was you weren’t supposed to let the world know that you were influential. So they would all with the, you know, possible exception of Eleanor Roosevelt would just sort of pretend as, was it best treatment or maybe Eisenhower or who said my husband runs the country and I flip the lamb chops.
-
I mean but Roselyn Carter made no pretense nor did her husband. It was considered a radical act when she showed up at cabinet meetings and sat there quietly. Taking notes. And she was really frustrated by some of the reactions she would get from breaking against those stereotypes even in the nineteen seventies when, you know, second wave feminism was in its bloom. And I thought it was interesting that it was her predecessor, Betty Ford, who gave her a piece of advice that she really took to heart.
-
She said, look, you’re gonna get criticized no matter what you do. So you might as well do what you wanna do.
-
That sounds very Barbara Bush. She wrote in her autobiography that Jimmy and I had always worked side by side as a tradition in Southern families and one that is not seen in any way demeaning to the man. I also think there was not a very subtle implication the cabinet meetings were no place for a wife. I was supposed to take care of the house, period. She knew that this would raise eyebrows that she would show up at the cabinet meetings, but she also pointed out she challenged traditional constraints that had been put on other first ladies and maybe making it easier for people like Hillary Clinton.
-
She traveled abroad. She met heads of state. On matters of actual substance. Right? I mean, as you reminded us, she also would interrupt her husband at White House dinners to explain something more you’re leaving he was doing.
-
It’s pretty remarkable what you think about that.
-
And and I really do think that the the first ladies who have come since really owe her a great debt for, you know, kind of clearing a path that gave all of them a lot more ability to kind of decide for themselves because first lady is such a tough, you know, it’s a role that comes with so many expectations. But you know, no job description. I mean, each of them has had to make this role their own and also each of them, you know, as they find themselves in their own moment in history, you know, as a partner to someone whose weaknesses and strengths, they understand like no one else does. I do think Rosalyn Carter made it easier for those who came after her.
-
You also pointed out though that her instincts were not always perfect. I mean, she kept a very, very close eye on politics. She was very much a political creature, but she was the one who urged, Jimmy. To shake up his cabinet and to give that famous crisis of confidence addressed to the nation, which is often called the malaise speech, even though we didn’t use the word malaise. That’s what I did.
-
I was actually thinking of before that that that sort of that sense of Jimmy Carter, the malaise speech in some ways, defined him in a way that I don’t think that he intended him, maybe it was completely unfair. That was her idea? She was very much on board and pushing him to do this. Now would he have done it without her influence you know, who knows?
-
I mean but the other thing is and I I found this as I was researching my own book. The wives often carry the the scars, even in a way their husbands don’t. Yeah. And when Jimmy Carter lost in nineteen eighty, someone said to him, you know, you don’t seem all that bitter. And she says, because I’m bitter enough for both of us.
-
Which is really interesting because when I read that, I was thinking, well, that’s that’s fully not the persona that you think of, but it but it is true that I think one of the hardest things in politics is to be the spouse of the candidate or the official because you’re taking all the arrows, but you don’t always have the ability fire back in the same kind of way. And I have noted this in the past, but but, yeah, that that quote, I am bitter enough for the both of us. What was she bitter about?
-
I think that her husband’s achievements were not recognized. I I which certainly they have been, I think, in in some ways, a lot more by history than by the population. Then she was she was mad at Reagan. She when I was writing my own book, one of the great mysteries to me was why did Nancy Reagan and Barbara Bush hate each other so much? And it was George Will, who was very close to Nancy Reagan said because, you know, the wives sometimes can’t get past things, and the two of them never got past the nineteen eighty primary.
-
Wow. How did Nancy get along with, with Roselyn Carter?
-
Oh, they didn’t get along either. And
-
Maybe it was a Nancy issue.
-
Well, it it could have been. And in fact, so as Nancy Reagan is getting in trouble, for a number of things early in her own time as first lady. The biggest you might remember was in the middle of the worst recession Since the Great Depression, she raised private money to buy a set of thousand dollar a place setting China. New China for the White House.
-
Mhmm.
-
Basically, Nancy Reagan would get up and say, basically, the carters that just let the place go. And finally, Rosalyn Carter gets up and says, you know, I thought it was sort of charming to mix place settings. And we always tried to make it I mean, she had just sort of Roselyn just sort of had it. And the other thing Nancy Reagan did was she called up, you know, people who were running the White House and asked if it was possible for the carters to move out a little early so that they could start recheck or any that didn’t go over well either.
-
No. You wouldn’t expect that it would. You know, you think you think back. I mean, I was I was thinking as you were describing the the the long history of very, very influential first ladies It is such an interesting story because, of course, you had some who were not in not particularly at least as far as we know. Not particularly impactful, but then you have the Eleanor Roosevelt.
-
You have the Edith Will Saletan. And, you have, Lady Bird Johnson, and, of course, Nancy Reagan, And then, of course, leading up to, to Hillary Clinton. In some ways, Melania Trump is really the exception being one of the obviously quite glamorous, but really in the tradition of influential first ladies, probably the most negligible, what do you think?
-
Yeah. I think her big initiative, which was to, you know, that be best initiative where she was talking about anti bullying. I couldn’t tell whether she was trolling her husband.
-
Yeah. I don’t think that people like historians are gonna look back and they and one of the turning points in civility in America was the Trump administrations be best initiative. I don’t I suppose if you looked at it at scans, you could say, yeah, this is her way of trying to distance herself from the husband. I mean, it is extraordinary when you think about how close many of these couples were and how how much their stories are intertwined. Donald Trump is going through some things right now, and Melania is never at his side.
-
And I’m trying to think, which is very historical parallel to that? I mean, it’s just odd. Don’t you think?
-
It is unusual. And I think another contrast here, there’s a wonderful Netflix documentary based on this lady bird book that came out a few years ago, where they’re playing the audio from Lady Bird’s diary. And again, as I point out in the column, it shows her influence, but the fact that she’s stipulated that these diaries couldn’t come out until after her death was evidence that she didn’t want people to know how influential she was. But what she would do. She was an incredibly important source of support and strength to her husband as he was suffering what sounded like some pretty severe problems with depression.
-
Mhmm.
-
And again, this is certainly not the sort of role you hear about from Melania, but who knows? Maybe there’s an milania audio diary that we will get to hear someday.
-
That’s possible. They could be there somewhere. I’m not gonna hold out a great deal of hope for all of this. Karen Tomulty is associate editor in columnist for the Washington Post on the ground, on the front lines in New Hampshire. Thank you so much for taking time out from the field to talk with us today.
-
I appreciate it. And and have a happy Thanksgiving.
-
Thank you, Charlie. It is always a pleasure.
-
And just a reminder that with everything that’s going on, we still actually do have things to be thankful for. And thank you all for listening to today’s Bulwark podcast time Charlie Sykes I will be back next week, and we’ll do this all over again. We’ll work contest produced by Katie Cooper, and engineered and edited by Jason Brown.
Want to listen without ads? Join Bulwark+ for an exclusive ad-free version of The Bulwark Podcast! Learn more here. Already a Bulwark+ member? Access the premium version here.